* I didn't make it beyond the first 20 pages.
** I made it to the end, but I either skimmed or skipped large sections.
*** I might have skipped/skimmed, but I liked it and might read it again.
**** I read at least 95% of the book and it was good -- probably will be reread.
***** I read every word, and I loved it! A favorite and definite reread.
This year, I'm only going to list the stars and a brief recommendation for the type of readers I think will enjoy the book [(R) means it's a re-read;  means it's an ARC].
Whenever I'm With You, by Lydia Sharp -- recommended for those who like sweet romance, those who like less familiar settings (Alaska, in this case), and those who like tales of healing -- Scholastic, 1/17
(This was sweet, and I liked the characters. It was a little slow-moving for my taste, which is why I ended up skimming the last half.)
Split the Sun, by Tessa Elwood -- recommended for those who like sci-fi, those who like angsty circumstances, and those who like teen romance -- Running Press Books, 12/16
(This was mostly enjoyable, though the world building was weak. It also was a little annoying that Kit had everyone (and everything) completely against her. It simply didn't seem even slightly realistic...but the romance made up for some of it, though it was kind of instalove -- and not always well defined. I suppose that's why I did some skimming.)
Antisocial, by Jillian Blake -- recommended for those who like books about social media, those who like teen drama, and those who don't mind overly shallow teen depictions -- Delacorte, 5/17
(The premise here was pretty interesting -- and mostly realistic, I'd say. I also liked the main character and sympathized with her. However, her inner dialogue/personal narrative didn't really jive with statements regarding her past actions, including older texts by her. I didn't think someone with her sympathy and perception would be so mean to her friends. In fact, that was a weakness I found with most of the teen depictions here: all of them were mean or shallow or even cruel. It was like the author is trying to say that teens can't be thoughtful or careful or circumspect in their actions. It's very possible that the goal was to show how all that gets thrown out in social media or texting...and that's probably realistic. Many, many people text things or use social media in ways they would *never* do in person or to someone's face...so all in all, a thought-provoking tale.)